Concept demo · HealthLiteracyCopilot vision · People, plans and numbers are illustrative · Not medical advice← Back to the concept
HealthLiteracyCopilot sample artifact· Interactive branching story· Audience: Rosa, 47 — average risk, never screened, busy small-business owner; worried about cost, prep and embarrassment· © HealthcareGPS Inc - Copyright 2026Details
AI-assisted · Clinical review required · Provenance label (illustrative) Story branches reviewed with simulated readers (illustrative)
Sample Health Plan · Stories
    Why this works — evidence, behavior-change coding, and how HealthLiteracyCopilot builds it

    Evidence basis

    • Narrative persuasion. Stories with a relatable character lower counter-arguing and raise self-efficacy (entertainment-education). The reader makes Rosa's choices, so the story answers their objection first.
    • Barrier-first design. The branches map to the most-reported reasons people skip colorectal screening: "I feel fine," cost, embarrassment, and prep/time.
    • Honest trade-offs. Each test shows its real downsides (yearly repeat; follow-up colonoscopy after a non-normal FIT; prep and a ride). This follows decision-aid principles (IPDAS) instead of pushing one option.
    • Implementation intentions. "I will ___ on ___ at ___" plans (Gollwitzer) close the gap between intending and doing. The calendar file turns the plan into a reminder.
    • Numbers as natural frequencies with an icon array (1 in 24 / 1 in 26), not percentages.

    Behavior Change Techniques (BCT Taxonomy v1)

    BCTWhere
    5.1 Information about health consequencesMyth card; lifetime risk icon array
    1.2 Problem solvingWorry branches (cost, embarrassment, time)
    9.1 Credible sourceDr. Lee; plan member services
    1.4 Action planning"I will ___ on ___ at ___" planner
    7.1 Prompts/cuesCalendar reminder (.ics)
    12.5 Adding objects to the environmentPlan card to print and post

    COM-B target

    Reflective motivation (myths, risk), psychological capability (what each test involves), and physical opportunity (cost, time, a ride).

    How HealthLiteracyCopilot would generate, personalize and assess it

    • Generate: a branch graph from the approved screening source content. Each node is checked against the clinical source so no branch drifts from it.
    • Personalize: the author picks the lead character, setting, language and which barrier appears first for the audience. Branch order is reviewed with simulated readers (simulated participants, not patients), then with real people in consented research.
    • Assess: CDC Clear Communication Index per node, PEMAT actionability, an IPDAS-style balance check (every option shows benefits and harms), and WCAG 2.2 checks on the interaction.

    What a pilot would measure

    Proximal: completion rate, which barrier members pick (a research signal for the plan), plans made, and calendar downloads. Distal: FIT kit returned or colonoscopy completed within 90 days (the colorectal cancer screening quality measure). Measures a pilot would track, not results or promised effects.